As is outstanding, the global T&C (Textile and Clothing) industry has been administered since 1974 by an arrangement of quantities known as the Multi Fiber Arrangement (MFA). According to the WTO Agreement on Materials and Clothing (ATC), all share forcing individuals from WTO were required to lift the whole scope of shares on materials and attire starting at 1 January, 2005. This was to be completed in four stages, in ten years, starting from 01 January, 1995. With the fourth eliminate period coming Lunder fulfillment on December 31, 2004 worldwide exchange materials and garments has gone into another territory. This changed market progression was relied upon to have essential ramifications for all concerned, the created nations which are the significant merchants and the creating nations and the slightest created nations (LDCs) which are the significant exporters and are profiting Bangladesh. Undoubtedly a portion of the LDCs, for example, Bangladesh could pick up a solid a dependable balance in a portion driven worldwide attire advertise over the past a long time. Despite the fact that the quantity did not give an ensured showcase, it for sure gave Bangladesh and other creating nations a specific level of consistency and security in getting to the clothes markets of created nations to give full focus to foreign direct investors.


The consequences of amount free administration in attire exchange were probably going to be a few. Created nation Material/array makers were never again going to have the insurance that the quantities gave. On the other hand, creating nation makers and exporters were not any more controlled by amounts. Mutilations in the worldwide array showcase as passage confinements and amount premiums were from this time forward to be supplanted by rivalry and focused cost. As is known, China was not one of the first signatories of the GATT Uruguay Round, and agreed to the WTO and turned into a part just in 2001. It was generally perceived, and caught, that under a share free administration China would develop as a noteworthy player in the worldwide array/material showcase. Creating nations were uneasy that it would be China which was best situated to remove the most noteworthy favorable position from a share free administration. It was felt that China had the ability to ‘upset’ the market. In perspective of the above, from the Bangladesh viewpoint, the accompanying inquiries have all the earmarks of being of critical significance with regards to the US showcase:


Is China’s command going to have substantial effect on Bangladesh’s fare arranged RMG fares to the US showcase?


– For which array classifications in the US advertise both Bangladesh and China have normal vital interests?


– What is the relative aggressiveness circumstance amongst Bangladesh and China as to the things of fare enthusiasm for the US advertise?


– What is probably going to be the effect of the portion on Chinese fares of clothes in the US advertise as imagined under terms and states of China’s promotion to the WTO?


– How should Bangladesh strategize to reinforce her situation in the US showcase in perspective of (I) China’s aggressive quality, (ii) the breathing space gave under the WTO material/array protect provision and (iii) Bangladesh’s similar leeway opposite China specifically classes?




Rising Dominance of China in Global Textile/Apparels Market By any measure China’s clothes and material area is in reality very expansive. China has reported its material and attire enterprises to be the column business of the country. The area at display utilizes over 10 million specialists, and underpins, straightforwardly or by implication, around another 90 million individuals through its


different in reverse and forward linkages. The Chinese government participates in an assortment of exercises, some including out of line and hostile to aggressive exchange hones, which make China a standout amongst the most focused makers on the planet. The refreshed Tenth Five-Year Plan conceives various goals in this unique circumstance. These allude to focuses in different zones including : an) Annual development rate, b) Industrial esteem development rate, c) Growth rate for outside trade to be earned, d) Proportionate development for various material and attire divisions, e) Labor efficiency development, f) Renovation and upgradation of the cotton turning, fleece yarn also, weaving, silk and material, sewed material, synthetic filaments, mechanical material, modern material apparatus, coloring and completing, the array area, including development of fares, and g) advancement of marked and youngsters’ attire. It isn’t hard to surmise from this rundown that China is seeking after a concentrated long haul objective towards turning into the overwhelming player in the worldwide clothes/material scene, and holding this situation over the consequent years. Promotion to the WTO, in November 2001, opened up new open doors for assist entrance of the worldwide market by China’s exporters of material/clothes items. With WTO participation China turned into a recipient of the worldwide exchanging discipline in attire, all the more especially the Agreement on Materials and Clothing (ATC). China could now position herself to exploit the eliminate of the standard under the third period of the ATC (which was put into constrain on January 01, 2002) and could anticipate the advantages accumulating from the last standard eliminate (which was to be actualized on January 01, 2005). In this manner, China was all around ready to take full preferred standpoint of the chances of the worldwide market once the portion free administration was in full impact.


US Market and China


As was not out of the ordinary, after her increase to the WTO China began to settle in her a dependable balance in the US advertise for some items, most prominently, array and materials. On its part, the US started to nearly screen consistence by China of her commitments under the promotion assention and her fare record and execution in the US advertise. On 11 December 2003 (two years after China’s promotion into the WTO), the United States Trade Representative (USTR) distributed its second answer to the Joined States Congress on China’s condition of consistence with her WTO commitments. The principle objection in the USTR report was that China had neglected to execute her WTO responsibilities in some key parts of monetary significance to the United States. The USTR whined that standardization of market component in China stayed fragmented. It was further claimed that the Chinese government had as often as possible mediated in the market. The report moreover blamed China for occupying consideration from the execution disappointment by controlling exchange streams to deliver an impermanent ascent in the antagonistic effect emerging from imports from the United States. There were charges of out of line exchange hones by China including I) cash control, ii) proceeded arrangements of immediate and backhanded appropriations to the nearby (Chinese) makers, iii) utilization of unjustified specialized and security principles to prohibit outside items and iv) poor protected innovation rights authorization.


China’s iron hold on the conversion scale of yuan went under serious assault from the USA. Fast financial development, huge exchange surplus and immense FDI inflows which, exclusively and together, ought to have under typical conditions, prompted a valuation for the Yuan. In any case, regardless of this China sought after a consider arrangement of keeping her money pegged at 8.2 Yuan/dollar since 1994 (it was generally trusted the Yuan was 40% underestimated). This gave China impressive preferred standpoint in the trade showcase. Despite the fact that the Chinese government had changed its arrangement in this way, by valuing the Yuan by 2%, by the by the Yuan-dollar conversion scale has all the earmarks of being significantly underrated, at the present 8.11 Yuan/dollar.Other than cash control there was a large group of other express and concealed approaches which, concurring to the aforementioned report, gave China an aggressive edge opposite different nations. China’s 13% assessment discount on material and attire items, government endowment of state-possessed material and clothing ventures (which, curiously, includes 52% of the material part and 25% of the clothing producing division), and accessibility of “free credit” for both general society and private undertakings give her huge chances to undermine her rivals.


Shield Measures Against China


Anxious about the possibility of interruption in the worldwide attire/material trade12, created nations could influence China to consent to certain defend measures amid China’s WTO promotion arrangements. The thought was to guarantee that the portion free administration was put into impact in an systematic way.


As per China’s WTO Accession Agreements13, the United States and other WTO part nations, under the material particular protect arrangements, can singularly apply specific shields (Unique T&C Safeguard Measures) on imports of materials and clothes from China for four extra a long time past the end of material and clothing standards under the WTO-ATC – that is from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008. This limitation is relevant just for a time of multi year and no notice to WTO is required if and when such limitations are forced. Endless supply of the concerned Member nation, China is required as far as possible its shipment to at most 7.5% (6% for fleece items) over the sum sent out amid the initial a year of the 14 months time frame going before the discussion ask.




Bangladesh’s fare arranged RMG division, with around 4000 firms and a workforce of around 1.6 to 1.8 million is a basically imperative portion of the nation’s economy. A few million other individuals are dependant on this segment, straightforwardly or in a roundabout way, through multiplier affect. In 2004, Bangladesh’s attire fare to the world was USD 4.44 billion, which was 1.72% of the aggregate world clothing market share. With trades coming to about USD 9.0 billion out of 2006 the offer is set to go up.


It’s a given that Bangladesh could exploit the security gave in the US showcase under the MFA, and the share free administration for LDCs in the EU advertise (when portion was forced on other non-LDC nations) under the GSP. Bangladesh’s RMG trade profit to the US showcase expanded from USD 373.96 million in FY1991 to USD 2198.42 million in FY2001. Be that as it may, quickly following China’s promotion to the WTO and the resulting MFN treatment in the US advertise, Bangladesh’s fare to US started to encounter a decay under developing rivalry. It is intriguing to take note of that fares of RMG to US descended from USD 2198.42 million in FY2001 to USD 1628.18 million in FY2004. It is simply after FY2004 that we discover fares to the US has by and by grabbed, to achieve USD 2026.09 million in FY2005 and USD 2631.28 million in FY2006.


China’s Foreign Exchange Policy


As was expressed before China has been seeking after a settled swapping scale approach for quite a while by settling her money against the dollar. This, by definition, doesn’t abuse the WTO or IMF rules. In any case, the soul of the WTO is damaged when conversion standard is utilized to make counterfeit upper hand in the worldwide market. This is additionally disregarding IMF rules which debilitate control of trade rate to increase uncalled for upper hand. China has utilized her cash arrangement shrewdly to pick up upper hand in the US clothes advertise. As has been generally detailed, the Yuan broke the mentally vital boundary of 8 Yuan/USD on 15 May, 2006, the most elevated amount since July 200541. It is conceived that the Yuan might be permitted to increase in value by about another 4-6% out of 2007. Be that as it may, the same number of studies have called attention to, given China’s tremendous forex saves and the colossal surplus to be determined of exchange with USA lately, the Yuan swapping scale against dollar ought to have experienced huge gratefulness if it somehow happened to be decided in a market-driven setting. Be that as it may, China has given solid sign that she is resolved to seek after an ‘oversaw swapping scale’ and any gratefulness will happen just in staged way and at a moderate pace.

No comments so far.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Website Field Is Optional.

Your NameYour Name